To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations
نویسندگان
چکیده
Single minded agents have strict preferences, in which a bundle is acceptable only if it meets a certain demand. Such preferences arise naturally in scenarios such as allocating computational resources among users, where the goal is to fairly serve as many requests as possible. In this paper we study the fair division problem for such agents, which is harder to handle due to discontinuity and complementarities of the preferences. Our solution concept—the competitive allocation from equal incomes (CAEI)—is inspired from market equilibria and implements fair outcomes through a pricing mechanism. We study the existence and computation of CAEI for multiple divisible goods, cake cutting, and multiple discrete goods. For the first two scenarios we show that existence of CAEI solutions is guaranteed, while for the third we give a succinct characterization of instances that admit this solution; then we give an efficient algorithm to find one in all three cases. Maximizing social welfare turns out to be NP-hard in general, however we obtain efficient algorithms for (i) divisible and discrete goods when the number of different types of players is a constant, (ii) cake cutting with contiguous demands, for which we establish an interesting connection with interval scheduling, and (iii) cake cutting with a constant number of players with arbitrary demands. Our solution is useful more generally, when the players have a target set of desired goods, and very small positive values for any bundle not containing their target set. ∗The authors aknowledge support from the Danish National Research Foundation and The National Science Foundation of China (under the grant 61361136003) for the Sino-Danish Center for the Theory of Interactive Computation and from the Center for Research in Foundations of Electronic Markets (CFEM), supported by the Danish Strategic Research Council. A part of this work was done while Simina Brânzei and Ruta Mehta were visiting the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing. Simina Brânzei was also supported by ISF grant 1435/14 administered by the Israeli Academy of Sciences and Israel-USA Bi-national Science Foundation (BSF) grant 2014389, as well as the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The Israel Science Foundation. †Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. E-mail: [email protected] ‡Tsinghua University, China. E-mail: [email protected] §University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 1 ar X iv :1 60 2. 09 08 8v 2 [ cs .G T ] 2 8 A pr 2 01 6
منابع مشابه
Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations
e goal of fair division is to distribute resources among competing players in a “fair” way. Envy-freeness is the most extensively studied fairness notion in fair division. Envy-free allocations do not always exist with indivisible goods, motivating the study of relaxed versions of envy-freeness. We study the envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) property, which states that no player prefers the b...
متن کاملStepwise randomized combinatorial auctions achieve revenue monotonicity
In combinatorial auctions that use VCG, a seller can sometimes increase revenue by dropping bidders (see e.g. [5]). In our previous work [26], we showed that such failures of “revenue monotonicity” occur under an extremely broad range of deterministic strategyproof combinatorial auction mechanisms, even when bidders have “known single-minded” valuations. In this work we consider the question of...
متن کاملTruthful Mechanisms for Exhibitions
We consider the following combinatorial auction: Given a range space (U,R), and m bidders interested in buying only ranges in R, each bidder j declares her bid bj : R → R+. We give a deterministic truthful mechanism, when the valuations are single-minded: when R is a collection of fat objects (respectively, axis-aligned rectangles) in the plane, there is a truthful mechanism with a 1 + (respect...
متن کاملOn Maxsum Fair Cake Divisions
We consider the problem of selecting fair divisions of a heterogeneous divisible good among a set of agents. Recent work (Cohler et al., AAAI 2011) focused on designing algorithms for computing maxsum—social welfare maximizing—allocations under the fairness notion of envyfreeness. Maxsum allocations can also be found under alternative notions such as equitability. In this paper, we examine the ...
متن کاملPricing to Maximize Revenue and Welfare Simultaneously in Large Markets
We study large markets with a single seller which can produce many types of goods, and many multi-minded buyers. The seller chooses posted prices for its many items, and the buyers purchase bundles to maximize their utility. For this setting, we consider the following questions: What fraction of the optimum social welfare does a revenue maximizing solution achieve? Are there pricing mechanisms ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016